The importance of attendance notes, a Judicial Reminder to be precise in the recording of all communications

In the recent case of Mr Douglas Hague v British Telecommunications Plc attention has been drawn to the importance of attendance notes in supporting agreements between the parties when a point is contested. The circumstances of this claim pertain to the Claimant, Mr Douglas Hague, who was diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Settlement was achieved…

Holmes: A Study in Conduct

Holmes v West London Mental Health Trust In this exceptionally serious case of mismanagement of a Claimant resulting in Lithium poisoning, the Judge examined the Part 36 rules when considering the appropriate order to make on costs liability resulting in an award of indemnity costs for the Claimant. The case is indeed some welcome news…

QOCS Induced, Damages Lost: “Successful” Defendants able to recover costs from Claimant’s damages recovered from “Unsuccessful” Defendants in NIHL case.

Cartwright v Venduct Engineering Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1654 The above case was originally heard by Regional Costs Judge Hale and was then leapfrogged to the Court of Appeal.  The upshot is that “successful” Defendants can take advantage of the sums paid to the Claimant by an “unsuccessful” Defendant, but not when the matter settles…

Discretion of the Court confirmed where QOCS protection in mixed claims does not apply – an overview

The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Brown [2018] EWHC 2046 – This appeal concerns the operation of the qualified one-way costs shifting regime (known as QOCS) contained in Section II of Part 44 of the CPR. The original claim: The claim concerned the Metropolitan Police – with the help of Greater Manchester Police (GMP) (Defendants)…